Christopher v. Target Corporation
| Christopher Goetz |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2018cv01657 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Nancy J Koppe |
| James C Mahan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Target Corporation. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Grandgenett, Roger) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #5 Amended Complaint by Defendant Target Corporation. Responses due by 11/6/2018. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 12/7/2018. (Branson, Z.) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Christopher Goetz re #5 Amended Complaint, #3 Summons Issued. Target Corporation served on 10/2/2018, answer due 10/23/2018. (Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Target Corporation by Christopher Goetz. No changes to parties. Proof of service due by 12/13/2018.(Watkins, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Christopher Goetz. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Santos, Theresa) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Target Corporation. (JM) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6 this case has been assigned to the Early Neutral Evaluation Program. Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr will be the evaluating judge in this case. (no image attached) (JM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5223464) by Goetz Christopher. Proof of service due by 11/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Right to Sue Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Rights.445, #3 Summons proposed summons)(Watkins, Daniel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. (JM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Christopher v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Roger L Grandgenett |
| Represented By: | Z. Kathryn Branson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christopher Goetz | |
| Represented By: | Theresa M. Santos |
| Represented By: | Daniel R Watkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
