Gordon v. North Las Vegas Police Department et al
| Norma Gordon |
| City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department, City of Las Vegas, Officer Sloan, Adams and Slocum |
| 2:2018cv02189 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| George Foley |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Norma Gordon. All Defendants. (Paternoster, Glenn) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint filed by Adams, City of North Las Vegas, Slocum. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 2/3/2019.(Eidsmore, Noel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 9 Joint STATUS REPORT by Defendants City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department. (Eidsmore, Noel) |
| Filing 8 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of North Las Vegas by Norma Gordon. Adds and removes parties. Proof of service due by 3/11/2019.(Paternoster, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVAL by Defendants City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department. (Eidsmore, Noel) |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Amend Complaint. Second Amended Complaint deadline: 12/14/2018. Answer Deadline: 20 days after Second Amended Complaint is served. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
| Filing 5 First STIPULATION and Order Extending Time for Plaintiff to Amend Complaint and for Defendant to Answer the Second Amended Complaint by Defendants City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department. (Eidsmore, Noel) |
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/16/2018. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MAJ) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Eidsmore, Noel) |
| Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/15/2018. Statement regarding removed action is due by 11/30/2018. Joint Status Report regarding removed action is due by 12/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court - Clark County Nevada, Case Number A-18-768159-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-5323086) by City of North Las Vegas, North Las Vegas Police Department. Proof of service due by 2/5/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Eidsmore, Noel) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
