Reese v. Bryan et al
| James M. Reese |
| Gregory Bryan and Romeo Aranas |
| 2:2019cv00512 |
| March 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Richard F Boulware |
| Peggy A Leen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to All Defendants re #1 Complaint. (ADR)
|
|
Filing 3
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Plaintiff James M. Reese. (McLetchie, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by James M. Reese. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (McLetchie, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-5480835) by James M. Reese. Proof of service due by 6/24/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Proposed Summons (G.Bryan), #3 Summons Proposed Summons (R.Aranas))(McLetchie, Margaret) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court.
|
|
Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. (ADR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
