Cases 1 - 10 of 320
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 23-3832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANAS and FRANCISCO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, S.L. CLARK, JAMES COX and others
Woods v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Woods
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, Erin Parks, Desiree Hultenschmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fly v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dane Fly
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, NDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brian K Wilson
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Keast et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Micheal Miller
Defendant:
John Keast, Halki, Jessica Rambur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
Ronald Mulder v. Marks, et al
as 23-15090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. MULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKS, Dr., NAUGHTON, Dr., ROMEO ARANAS and others
Dante Pattison v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 23-15066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE HANALEI PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, PETERSON, Doctor; 32 - suggestion of death and others
Sam McFarland v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 22-17016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAM MCFARLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES DANIELS, MD MICHAEL MINEV, DR. HANF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
