Sigal et al v. Remmers et al
| Jeremy E Sigal and Stephanie L Sibley |
| Jennifer Nash, Sr. Brian Williams, Ternes, Shelley Carrao, Nordgren, Dwayne Deal, Manuel Portillo, Nedza, Woodward, Anne Carpenter, Michael Sweeten, Jeremy Bean, Ms. Hubbard-Pickett, Wendy Remmers, Jackson, Hubbard-Pickett and Brian Williams |
| 2:2019cv01215 |
| July 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME re #6 Motion to Dismiss (First Request), by Plaintiffs Stephanie L Sibley, Jeremy E Sigal. (MR) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/21/2019. Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland as to #6 Motion to Dismiss. Opposition due 14 days from the date of this Minute Order, and reply due seven 7 days after the filing of the opposition. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #6 Motion to Dismiss, by Defendants Jeremy Bean, Anne Carpenter, Shelley Carrao, Dwayne Deal, Hubbard-Pickett, Jackson, Jennifer Nash, Nedza, Nordgren, Manuel Portillo, Wendy Remmers, Michael Sweeten, Ternes, Brian Williams, Woodward. (Miles, Michael) Modified on 8/21/2019 (MMM). |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint, by Defendants Jeremy Bean, Anne Carpenter, Shelley Carrao, Dwayne Deal, Hubbard-Pickett, Jackson, Jennifer Nash, Nedza, Nordgren, Manuel Portillo, Wendy Remmers, Michael Sweeten, Ternes, Brian Williams, Woodward. Responses due by 9/3/2019. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 9/19/2019. (Miles, Michael) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed re #2 Summons Issued. Jeremy Bean, Hubbard-Pickett, Jennifer Nash, Manuel Portillo, Ternes, and Brian Williams: served on 7/30/2019, answer due 8/20/2019. Anne Carpenter, Shelley Carrao, Jackson, Nedza, and Michael Sweeten: served on 7/31/2019, answer due 8/21/2019. (MR) |
Filing 4
ORDER. It is ordered that this case will proceed on the normal litigation track. It is further ordered that Plaintiffs must perfect service within ninety (90) days from the date of this order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 3 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (MR) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to: Jeremy Bean, Anne Carpenter, Shelley Carrao, Dwayne Deal, Hubbard-Pickett, Jackson, Jennifer Nash, Nedza, Nordgren, Manuel Portillo, Wendy Remmers, Michael Sweeten, Ternes, Brian Williams re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $400) by Stephanie L Sibley, Jeremy E Sigal. Proof of service due by 10/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits Part 1, #2 Exhibits Part 2, #3 Exhibits Part 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Receipt No. NVLAS064874) (MR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (RT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
