Bell v. Walgreen Co.
| Kathleen Gladys Bell |
| Walgreen Co. |
| 2:2020cv01448 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-OPPOSITION to #5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Defendant Walgreen Co.. (Fowler, Jason) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for #6 Order Setting Hearing on Motion, #5 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney by Plaintiff Kathleen Gladys Bell. (Randall, Justin) |
Filing 6
ORDER Setting Hearing on #5 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Justin G. Randall for Plaintiff Kathleen Gladys Bell. Motion Hearing set for 10/14/2020 at 11:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must appear in person for the scheduled hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Justin G. Randall for Plaintiff Kathleen Gladys Bell. (Randall, Justin) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Kathleen Gladys Bell. There are no known interested parties other than those participating in the case (Randall, Justin) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER. This case has been assigned to the Honorable Andrew P. Gordon. Judge Gordon's Chambers Practices, which are posted on the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada public website, may also be accessed directly via this hyperlink: #www.nvd.uscourts.gov. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Walgreen Co. that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Corporate Parent Walgreen Co for Walgreen Co. added. (Driscoll, Vicki) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REMOVAL from District Court, Case Number A-20-815088-C, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0978-6113544) by Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Driscoll, Vicki) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. (HAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bell v. Walgreen Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walgreen Co. | |
| Represented By: | James F Holtz |
| Represented By: | Jason Andrew Fowler |
| Represented By: | Vicki L. Driscoll |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kathleen Gladys Bell | |
| Represented By: | Justin G. Randall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
