Diaz v. Nick et al
| Raul Diaz |
| George, Nick and Dr. Bryant |
| 2:2021cv01085 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Daniel J Albregts |
| Andrew P Gordon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Raul Diaz. (DRM) NOTE: Page 3 of IFP Application at ECF No. #1 . Modified on 7/8/2021 (PR). |
Filing 3
ORDER denying without prejudice #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The clerk shall send Plaintiff the forms for Application to Proceed FIP with instructions (attached herein); Plaintiff shall either pay the filing fee in full or complete the application and return it by 8/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 6/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions for distribution through law library)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) Modified text on 6/13/2021 (SLD).
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Raul Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Notice re IFP) (KR) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Andrew P. Gordon and Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. (SLD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
