Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02869
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02040
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Pettit
as 5:2026cv01573
Petitioner:
George Davis
Respondent:
Willis Pettit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02864
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02855
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Potter et al v. ARK Homes for Rent ET-2 LP et al
as 4:2026cv00165
Plaintiff:
Adriane Potter and George Faris
Defendant:
ARK Homes for Rent ET-2 LP, Amber Krayenhagen, Sentry Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TEHAN v. VANGUARD PARKING SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2026cv02254
Plaintiff:
GEORGE TEHAN
Defendant:
VANGUARD PARKING SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Van Liew et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2026cv06949
Plaintiff:
Katherine Van Liew, Anthony Brennan, George Wood and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02021
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
