Cases 1 - 10 of 817
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2025cv00016
Petitioner:
Malcolm Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Clerk George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. NRVRJ
as 7:2025cv00022
Defendant:
NRVRJ
Plaintiff:
George Albert Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bean v. City Of Richmond et al
as 7:2024cv00878
Defendant:
Jason S. Miyares, City Of Richmond, Jerrauld C. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Euphrates Earl Bean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00820
Defendant:
Crigger, Alex Whittington, Chad Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
George Friday, Sr. and Latarsha Williams
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Braxton et al v. Captain George's of South Carolina LP et al
as 4:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Pitsilides Management, LLC, Thomas Long, Pitsilambous, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Sample, Robert Hamrick, Hannah Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reed v. Keaton et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
John Reed
Defendant:
James Keaton, Rise, Pray and Grind Trucking, LLC and George Hildebrandt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks, Jr. v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Defendant:
Nehal Shah, Chadwick Dotson, Stephanie Vick and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.