Dixon v. Rivas et al
| Seanah Dixon |
| David Rivas and Michael Minev |
| 2:2022cv01445 |
| September 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Miranda M Du |
| Elayna J Youchah |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated per #7 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal due to duplicative action in case 2:22-cv-01412-APG-DJA. (TRW) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE/Motion of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Seanah Dixon. (HKL) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Emergency FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand, by Seanah Dixon. (DRM) |
| Filing 5 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, by Plaintiff Seanah Dixon. Responses due by 10/4/2022. (Image Identical to ECF No. #4 Motion.) (DRM) |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, by Plaintiff Seanah Dixon. Responses due by 10/4/2022. (DRM) |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/12/2022. On September 6, 2022, Plaintiff Seanah Dixon filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") and a civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983, which she identifies as "emergency" filings that concern the "imminent threat of [her] death." (ECF Nos. #1 , [1-1].) Among other things, Dixon alleges that David Rivas and Michael Minev were deliberately indifferent to her need to see a neurological specialist for her heart condition. This claim appears to duplicate parts of a claim that Dixon brings in another lawsuit she filed before filing this action, which is styled Seanah J. Dixon v. Stacy Barrett, 2:22-cv-01412-APG-DJA ("Dixon I"). The Court takes judicial notice of the record in Dixon I under Federal Rule of Evidence 201. The Court in Dixon I recently entered a screening order at ECF No. 4, allowing Dixon's Eighth Amendment deliberate-medical-indifference claim to proceed against David Rivas and Michael Minev, among others. The Dixon I Court also noted that it would enter a separate order on the motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that Dixon filed in that case.Based on the similarities between the medical-indifference claims pled in this action and Dixon I and the procedural posture of Dixon I, the Court does not find that Dixon's complaint and IFP application in this case constitute an emergency. The Court will therefore screen the complaint in the ordinary course and not on an emergency basis. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - XC) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (KF) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 EMERGENCY MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Seanah Dixon. (Attachments: #1 Emergency Complaint)(DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
