Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Hintze v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-6806
Defendant:
KIRK WIDMAR, Associate Warden of Operations, LCC, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, Secretary of State/Board of Prison Commissioner, Dr. IHAN AZZAM, Medical Officer, Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Public and Behavioral Health and others
Plaintiff:
JASON HINTZE
Knight v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Knight
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Reubart, Rochelle Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villanueva v. Faulkner et al
as 2:2024cv01829
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Stacey Barrett, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Gutierrez et al
as 2:2024cv01481
Defendant:
Ben Gutierrez, Michael Minev, Sonya Carrillo and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leal v. Adamson, et al.
as 24-4594
Defendant:
TERENCE AGUSTIN, MARTIN NAUGHTON, CARLOS CALDERON and others
Plaintiff:
JACK LEAL
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00317
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Jennifer Nash, Brian Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Mister Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-4371
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GITTERE, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Beck v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-3907
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BECK
Defendant:
STEVE SISOLAK, CHARLES DANIELS, MICHAEL MINEV and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.