Tutankhaman v. NASA
Plaintiff: King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant: NASA
Case Number: 2:2022cv01582
Filed: September 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Presiding Judge: Richard F Boulware
Referring Judge: Elayna J Youchah
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2022 Filing 8 LETTER from King Michael Tutankhaman. (TRW)
November 7, 2022 Filing 7 COMPLAINT against NASA by King Michael Tutankhaman. Proof of service due by 2/5/2023. (TRW)
October 14, 2022 Filing 6 LETTER from King Michael Tutankhaman. (TRW)
September 28, 2022 Filing 5 LETTER from King Michael Tutankhaman. (TRW)
September 26, 2022 Filing 4 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued by Plaintiff King Michael Tutankhaman. (YAW)
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that all 60 pending matter filed by Plaintiff that are listed in the caption be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff be ordered to show cause in writing no later than 10/21/2022, why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that if Plaintiff fails to show cause why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant, the Court declare Plaintiff vexatious and be enjoined and prohibited from filing documents in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada without first obtaining leave of Court to do so. Objections to R&R due by 10/4/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 9/20/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TRW)
September 19, 2022 Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (YAW)
September 19, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff King Michael Tutankhaman. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Review and Criminal Complaint)(YAW)
September 19, 2022 Case randomly assigned to Judge Richard F. Boulware, II and Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah. (JQC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tutankhaman v. NASA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: King Michael Tutankhaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Maxwell Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NASA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?