Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Dr. Pope Francis Gates Sr. Zarth Asgarth/Dr. Michael D. Gates III/ Michael Maxwell Hill/ A. Asgarth/ Dr. Alfie Eden Gotenk Gates/ Poncho Crump(actual)/ Dr. Melinda AC Gates/ Dr. Bill R. Gates/ Commiss v. Parsons
as 2:2022cv01994
Plaintiff:
Dr. Pope Francis Gates Sr. Zarth Asgarth/Dr. Michael D. Gates III/ Michael Maxwell Hill/ A. Asgarth/ Dr. Alfie Eden Gotenk Gates/ Poncho Crump(actual)/ Dr. Melinda AC Gates/ Dr. Bill R. Gates/ Commiss, King Michael Tutankhaman, King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman and others
Defendant:
Jim Parsons
Dr. Pope Francis Gates Sr. Zarth Asgarth/Dr. Michael D. Gates III/ Michael Maxwell Hill/ A. Asgarth/ Dr. Alfie Eden Gotenk Gates/ Poncho Crump(actual)/ Dr. Melinda AC Gates/ Dr. Bill R. Gates/ Commiss v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv01993
Plaintiff:
Dr. Pope Francis Gates Sr. Zarth Asgarth/Dr. Michael D. Gates III/ Michael Maxwell Hill/ A. Asgarth/ Dr. Alfie Eden Gotenk Gates/ Poncho Crump(actual)/ Dr. Melinda AC Gates/ Dr. Bill R. Gates/ Commiss, King Michael Tutankhaman, King Dr. Mygu Michael Nygu Tutankhaman and others
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Tutankhaman v. T-Mobile Telecommunications
as 2:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
T-Mobile Telecommunications
Tutankhaman v. Rape House et al
as 2:2022cv01881
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Rape House, Nicholas Schulbatis and Anna Nicole Smith Schulbatis
Tutankhaman v. Enterprise Rent A Car Holdings
as 2:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Enterprise Rent A Car Holdings
Tutankhaman v. McCullough
as 2:2022cv01879
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
William Daniel McCullough
Tutankhaman v. Skinner
as 2:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Sergio Skinner
Tutankhaman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Nigel Lewis, Tamara Tolbert, Christopher Reed and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.