Greene v. Neven et al
Plaintiff: Delbert M. Greene
Defendant: Dwight Neven, Isidro Baca, Claud Willis, E. Jenkins, Bean, Jackson and J. Walker
Case Number: 3:2007cv00474
Filed: July 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Clark
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court CERTIFIES that any in forma pauperis appeal from its Order dated July 14, 2011, (docket 100 ) would not be taken "in good faith" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). (Copy of this Order has been electronically served to the USCA via CM/ECF, see NEF for service details.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 97 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. FURTHER ORDERED, Defendant's 92 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's 91 Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING the 89 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, Plaintiff's 88 Motion for Leave to File the Third Amended Complaint is GRANTED. The Clerk shall DETACH and FILE the thi rd amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED, Plaintiff's claim for retaliation against defendant Jackson be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED, Plaintiff's claim for conspiracy against defendants Bean, Jackson, and Walker be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED, Plaintiff's remaining claims be permitted to advance. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation (#69) entered on January 26, 2010, is adopted and accepted, andDefendants Motion to Dismiss (#45) is granted with prejudice as to Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment claim and all claims again st Defendants in their official capacity for money damages; all remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. See Order for Specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/30/10. (Image Attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG)
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER adopting 41 Report and Recommendation; and denying 27 plaintiff's Motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/30/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending P's 27 MOTION for a preliminary injunction be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 6/12/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 5/27/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Greene v. Neven et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delbert M. Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dwight Neven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isidro Baca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claud Willis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Jenkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?