Boren v. Bocca
Reo Boren |
Warden Bocca, Warden Watson, Grafron, Salispara, K. King, Cardella, Williams, Stankus, Bill Donat, Madieros, Frobes, Baker and Rogers |
3:2008cv00174 |
July 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Washoe |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Both |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 131 is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Motion for an Injunctive Order to Preserve Evidence/TRO 124 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED t hat plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Intervention to Order Preservation of Evidence and Reverse Dismissal 128 is DENIED as moot in light of the Report and Recommendation 131 and the District Courts orders denying reconsideration 115 and den ying Motion to Vacate 127 . FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Strike plaintiff's Motion for an Injunctive Order to Preserve Evidence/TRO 126 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' Second Motion to Strike 130 is GRANTED in light of the Report and Recommendation 131 . Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/6/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 117 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 4/19/2010. IT IS ORDERED that P's 116 request for copies is DENIED. P may submit a copy request form to the clerk of the court stating the specific documents he would like copied together with the appropriate fee. The clerk shall SEND a copy request form to plaintiff for his use (sent on 4/19/2010). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM) |
Filing 115 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks, on 3/9/2010. denying 114 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. See order re specifics. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 113 JUDGMENT - Ds 69 Motion for Summary is GRANTED as to Counts I and II with prejudice and Count III without prejudice. Plaintiffs 109 Petition for Writ of Mandamus is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/17/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 111 ORDER adopting 89 Report and Recommendations re 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 69 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts I and II with prejudice and Count III without prejudice; denying 93 plaintiff's reques t for transfer and counsel; denying 95 plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court, to Oppose Dismissal of Case, and Setting for Trial; denying 96 plaintiff's Opposition to Dismissal and Request for Jury Trial Date; denying 97 defendants 39; Motion to Strike; denying 101 plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery; denying 105 plaintiff's Motion for Trial A.S.A.P.; denying 106 plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery; and dismissing without prejudice 109 plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandamus. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/11/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 89 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting in part 69 defendants' motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's conspiracy claim in count II; and dismissing without prejudice plaintiff's conditions of confinement claims in count III. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/13/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.