Peck v. Washoe County et al
Plaintiff: Frank M. Peck
Defendant: Washoe County, Washoe County Jail, Haley and Thomas
Case Number: 3:2009cv00381
Filed: July 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
County: Washoe
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 5/2/2013, DENYING Plaintiff's 120 Motion for Contempt Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
March 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 109 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted, and Defendants' # 92 Motion for SummaryJudgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 117 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 3/25/2013, DENYING Plaintiff's 112 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider 108 Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
February 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER denying 103 plaintiff's motion to strike and motion for further briefing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 2/8/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
January 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 105 MINUTE ORDER denying 102 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider Magistrate Judge Order. US Marshal does not serve subpoenas in civil cases. See order for further specifics. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/24/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - WJ)
January 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER DENYING P's 99 Motion. The Clerk shall ISSUE one blank subpoena and SEND it to the plaintiff with this order. (Blank subpoena issued and mailed to P on 1/4/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/3/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER DENYING 90 Motion. Magistrate Judge's 83 Order is sustained. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/2/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JK)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER REGARDING 37 Report and Recommendation. IT IS ORDERED that the #37 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED, and Defendants' 32 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Defen dants' Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiff's excessive force claim against defendant John Doe #2 for threatening him and Plaintiff's Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment is GRANTED; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as to all other claims is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/8/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER denying as moot 27 Motion identifying unserved defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
August 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the complaint may proceed as to count II-A againstdefendants Thomas, Wheeler and John Does #1 and #2. FURTHER ORDERED that counts one, two and three are dismissed with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that count III-A is dismiss ed with leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Skolnick, Benedetti, Haley, Washoe County, Greta Fyi, Jane Doe #3, and John Doe #4 are dismissed with prejudice. Defendants Bell and Lindsay are dismissed without prejudice, pending defendants amendment of count III-A. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file his Second Amended Complaintwithin thirty (30) days. (Second Amended Complaint deadline: 9/3/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 07/30/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peck v. Washoe County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank M. Peck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washoe County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washoe County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?