Fernandez v. State Of Nevada et al
| Kevin Fernandez |
| Tara Caprenter, Greg Cox, Nancy Derloshon, E. Emmanuel, Eddie Gray, Caseworker Harkreader, Don Helling, Rogelio Herrarra, Susan Jackson, Michael Keeler, Nevada Board of Parole, Nevada Department Of Corrections, Jack Palmer, Robert Schofield, Maurice Silva, Howard Skolnick, State Of Nevada and Gail Waters |
| 3:2010cv00373 |
| June 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER overruling 117 OBJECTIONS re 108 / 109 Orders. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/6/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
157
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 3/25/2014, denying 156 Motion to Lift Stay. The clerk shall send a copy of 155 Order to plaintiff (mailed 3/26/2014). (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER denying 110 , 131 , and 143 motions; denying as moot 125 , 134 , 142 , and 148 motions; granting in part and denying in part 118 motion; denying, and conditionally granting in part as to Requests 68 and 69, 116 motion; denying as moot 132 motion to serve through personal service, deferring 132 motion to serve by publication; granting in part 130 motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 01/24/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
107
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 10/30/2013, granting Plaintiff's 105 Motion for Magistrate Judge to Reconsider 97 Order. The Office of the Attorney General shall advise on or before Friday, November 8, 2013 whether it will accept service on behalf of the State of Nevada. The remainder of the 97 order shall remain in full force and effect. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
97
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 10/10/2013, granting 92 Motion for Court to Issue and Serve Summons and Complaint and denying 93 Motion for Leave to File. Clerk shall issue summ ons for Rex Reed and send same to US Marshal (distributed to US Marshal 10/10/13). Clerk shall send to plaintiff USM-285 form, copy of 85 second amended complaint, and copy of this order (sent 10/10/13). Plaintiff shall have until 10/25/2013 to complete USM-285 form and return them with other documents to US Marshal. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 71 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order deadlines : Discovery due by 11/18/2013. Motions due by 12/18/2013. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/17/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/20/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
68
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 6/27/2013, granting in part 54 Motion to Exceed Photocopy Limit. The court will allow plaintiff a one-time opportunity to exceed his photcopy limit in the amount of $25.00. The Clerk shall mail copy of this order to Chief of Inmate Services (mailed 6/27/13). Please see attached for further details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING as moot 53 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 6/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDERED P shall show cause and file proof by 12/20/2012 that the claims herein are distinct from case 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-WGC and/or why this action should not be consolidated. FURTHER ORD if P files such proof Ds shall have 20 days to respond. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall SERVE this order and copy of P's # 6 complaint upon AG; (E-service on 11/20/2012; # 6 Complaint via NEF regeneration.); AG shall advise by 12/11/2012 whether it will enter a limited appearance for the purpose of responding to this order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/19/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
7
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as duplicative of Case No. 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-RAM. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 11/18/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 1 application to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee is GRANTED. However the full filing fee shall still be due. FURTHER ORDERED, the NDOC shall pay to the Clerk of the USDC, District of NV, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to the account of Plaintiff (in months that the account exceeds $10.00) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk shal l send a copy of this order to the attention of Chief of Inmate Service for the NDOP. (Sent: 11/18/2010.) FURTHER ORDERED, even if this action is dismissed, or is otherwise unsuccessful, the full filing fee shall still be due. FURTHER ORDERED , the Clerk shall FILE the complaint (docket 4 -1). FURTHER ORDERED, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as duplicative of Case No. 3:06-cv-00628-LRH-RAM. FURTHER ORDERED, plaintiff's 4 motion for leave to file complaint with additional pages is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/17/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
