Reberger v. LeGrand et al
| Lance Reberger |
| Brian Sandoval, D. Neven, Reed, Offender Management Division, R. Bruce, James G. Cox, Robert LeGrand, Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Renee Baker and Bruce R Bannister |
| 3:2012cv00296 |
| June 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's applications to proceed in forma pauperis 1 and 3 are GRANTED. Plaintiff not required to pay initial installment. NDOC shall pay Clerk 20% of the preceding month's deposits to plaint iff's account (in months that account exceeds $10.00), until full $350 filing fee paid. Clerk shall send copy of this order to Finance Division of Clerks Office. (Copy electronically sent 10/16/12.) Clerk shall send copy of ord er to Chief of Inmate Services. (Copy mailed 10/16/12.) Motion for extension of time 10 is GRANTED. Motions for extra $100 on NDOC prisons copy maching 7 and 9 are DENIED as moot. Motion for cause in response to screening order [1 1] is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED as untimely. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. An appeal from this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
