Cases 1 - 10 of 15,013
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Davids et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
John Davids, Jim Dunigan, John Bonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Seanica M Reed
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reed v. Vintage Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03186
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Reed
Defendant:
Vintage Healthcare Services, Inc. and Eno Akano
Reed v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tommie James Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Winston Najee Reed
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Quinn and Scharr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Carter v. Mark Ludwick, et al
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
Jason Carter
Defendant:
Mark D. Ludwick, Agent of Iowa Department of Criminal Investigation, in his individual capacity, Marion County, Iowa and Reed Kious, Marion County Deputy Sheriff in his individual capacity
Reed v. Hampton
as 3:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Lavern Justin Reed
Defendant:
Emily W Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mann v. Mayorkas
as 6:2024cv00200
Defendant:
Thapeloe John, Jeff Isabella, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
