Cases 1 - 10 of 616
Reed (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
LaQuann Reed
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Seanica M Reed
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al. *** REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.***
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Christopher J niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Bassford Remele, PA, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Traditions Health, LLC v. Huffman et al
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Traditions Health, LLC
Defendant:
Donald Huffman, Sharon Reed, Kaycee Funk and others
Reed (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
as 1:2024cv00921
Petitioner:
Andre D. Reed, Sr.
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Vigil
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Omar L. Reed
Defendant:
Joe Vigil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez Reed et al v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Hanna Gutierrez Reed, Alec Baldwin and Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, FNU LNU and Michelle L. Grisham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown et al v. Cheney et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jason Brown, Jared Young, Alan Swick and others
Defendant:
Jon Cheney and Jeremy Whitt
Lawton (PS) v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Reed Lawton
Defendant:
John Turner, Billy A Salazar and Daniel Walzl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
