Cisneros v. Baker
Petitioner: Maximilliano Cisneros
Respondent: Warden R. Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2013cv00033
Filed: January 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting motion to dismiss 25 . Petition 6 and amended petition 19 are dismissed with prejudice as untimely. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
November 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER directing that from this date forward the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/12/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
July 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING Petitioner's 14 Motion to Extend Time. Amended Petition due by 9/16/2013. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 07/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Petition and motion for appointment of counsel shall be filed and electronically served upon respondents (served via NEF 3/7/13). Respondents to file notice of appearance within 20 days. Motion for Appointment of Counsel GRANTE D. FPD appointed to represent Petitioner. Clerk shall electronically serve FPD copy of this order and copy of petition (served via NEF 3/7/13). FPD shall have 30 days to file notice of appearance or indicate its inability to represent petitioner. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/6/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that petitioner's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP without having to prepay the full filing fee is DENIED . Petitioner shall send fee to the clerk by 2/27/2013 . Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition and motion but not file them at this time. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cisneros v. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden R. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maximilliano Cisneros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?