Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Burgess v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Defendant:
Warden R Baker, James Dzurenda, Ms. Perkings and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Burgess, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamplin v. Baker et al
as 3:2017cv00716
Defendant:
Warden R Baker, Drain, Dugan and others
Plaintiff:
John David Pamplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Baca, et al
as 3:2017cv00343
Defendant:
I. Baca, Warden R Baker, C. Blockway and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie E. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Attorney General of the State of Nevada
as 3:2017cv00003
Respondent:
Warden R. Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Donald Evans, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
M'wanza v. Byrna et al
as 3:2016cv00590
Defendant:
Ashdown, Warden R. Baker, J. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Tacuma J. M'wanza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruz-Lopez v. Baker et al
as 2:2016cv01708
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden R Baker
Petitioner:
Yosvany Ruz-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Baker
as 2:2015cv02486
Respondent:
Warden R Baker
Petitioner:
Yosvany Ruz Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Baker
as 3:2013cv00033
Respondent:
Warden R. Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Maximilliano Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reberger v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2013cv00032
Respondent:
Warden R. Baker and Nevada, State Of
Appellant:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur v. Fikes et al
as 3:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
George Arthur
Defendant:
Warden R. Baker, A.W.O. D. Brooks, C/O Fikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
