Cox v. State of Nevada et al
| Michael Steve Cox |
| Baker, Smith, Nevada, State Of and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2013cv00053 |
| February 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDERED that the petition shall be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of exhaustion. FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as moot following upon the dismissal of the action without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certific ate of appealability is DENIED. Jurists of reason would not find the dismissal of the wholly unexhausted federal petition without prejudice to be debatable or wrong, for the reasons discussed herein. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgm ent accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 9 replaced on 8/22/2013 to correct caption clerical error) (DRM). Modified font on 8/22/2013 (DRM).
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER GRANTING 1 IFP Application. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall file the petition and accompanying motions. FURTHER ORD P shall SHOW CAUSE by 9/12/2013 why petition should not be dismissed for lack of exhaustion. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
