Mizzoni v. State of Nevada ex rel et al
| Joseph L. Mizzoni |
| Mr. Baca, Brannon, Cox, E.K. McDaniel, Nevada Department of Corrections, C. Smith, State of Nevada ex rel and Lisa Walsh |
| 3:2015cv00499 |
| October 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
ORDER approving ECF No. 170 Stipulation, dismissing with prejudice this action. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER granting ECF No. 168 Motion to Extend Time. Joint Stipulation and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice is due by 10/28/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER that the Court's order and judgment (ECF Nos. 149 , 150 ) are hereby vacated; this case is referred to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb to conduct a settlement conference; the parties must submit a proposed joint pretrial order (JPO) within 30 days of the date of the settlement conference if no settlement is reached. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM G. COBB ECF No. 139 is accepted and adopted in full; Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 118 is granted; Motion for Leave to File Document ECF No. 136 is denied; Clerk directed to enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER granting ECF No. 119 Defendant's Motion to Seal exhibits H and I of motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER that ECF No. 112 Magistrate Judge's R&R is accepted and adopted in full and ECF No. 100 Plaintiff's Spoliation Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER that ECF No. 77 Plaintiff's Objection is overruled; clerk directed to strike ECF No. 94 Plaintiff's reply in support of his Objection. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
112
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's ECF No. 100 Motion for Spoliation be granted in part and denied in part. Objections to R&R due by 10/11/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 82 Motion to Extend Time : Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Motion/Opposition (ECF No. 81 ) due by 7/17/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 7/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER - Plaintiff's Response/Motion (ECF No. 51 ) is GRANTED to the extent Plaintiff seeks to have a default entered against Defendant Smith. Plaintiff must make a separate application for entry of a default judgment against Defen dant Smith. To the extent Plaintiff's motion seeks to have a default judgment entered as to Defendant Smith, Plaintiff's motion is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
40
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 3/6/2017. Plaintiff's Motion to Respond to Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint... ECF No. 38 is DENIED with respect to the subject attendant to this matter. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING ECF Nos. 35 Motion to Compel; 36 Motion for Interrogatories; and 37 Motion for Admissions. (See pdf order for specifics.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/2/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDERED ECF No. 1 IFP application is granted. In the event that this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid Further ordered NDOC shall pay clerk from inmate account. Clerk shall SEND copy this order to Finance and NDOC inm ate services. (E-service to Finance; mail to NDOC on 12/12/2016.) Clerk shall electronically SERVE AG copy this order, and copy of ECF No. 7 First Amended Complaint. (E-service 12/12/2016; Amended complaint via NEF regeneration.) Subject to findi ngs of screening order (ECF No. 10 ), AG shall advise by 1/2/2017 re acceptance of service, and file under seal Ds' address(es) for which service not accepted. D shall file a motion re any unserved Ds. If service accepted, then answer due 2/10/2017. Henceforth P shall serve Ds copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying ECF No. 6 Motion for Reconsideration; granting ECF No. 8 Motion to Address First Amended Complaint; giving Plaintiff 30 days to file a second amended complaint; directing Clerk to send Plaintiff 1983 form, instructions, and copies of his ECF No. 7 complaint and ECF No. 8 motion. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
