Cases 1 - 10 of 13,532
Cox v. Commissioner Of Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2024cv01683
Plaintiff:
Samuel I. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Department of Human Services, Sara Kulas, Jane/John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Vandyke et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Vandyke, FNU Brock, J Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Cox, Jr. v. Superintendent of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Vernon Andre Cox, Jr.
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Houtzdale and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01124
Petitioner:
Christopher Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Cantu-Cox v. USA
as 2:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Carlos Mario Cantu-Cox
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
