Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Farm Bureau Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
FARM BUREAU PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Laddie Cox, John Doe as PR of the Estate of Basil W. Cox and Guilllermo Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Cox v. Rios et al
as 2:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Donnell Travis Cox
Defendant:
Hector Rios and Attorney General of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boudieu v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bryce Boudieu
Defendant:
Shae Cox and SLC Racing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Constructors, Inc. v. Baldwin-Cox Agency, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Constructors, Inc.
Defendant:
Baldwin-Cox Agency, LLC and Brent Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cox et al v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren Cox and Penny Ray Cox
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Bernalillo County et al
as 1:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Offender Management Systems, New Mexico Department of Corrections, Central New Mexico Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Bernalillo County et al
as 1:2020cv00535
Defendant:
Home Depot, Walgreen's, Flying J and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willes et al v. Hart
as 1:2020cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michelle Willes, Martin Willes and Michelle Cox
Defendant:
Geoffrey Hart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv01117
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sherri L. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Cox v. Albuquerque Police Department
as 1:2019cv00770
Defendant:
Albuquerque Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
