Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Cox v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02527
Plaintiff:
Angela Cox
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EFL Global LLC v. Cox et al
as 2:2024cv02454
Plaintiff:
EFL Global LLC
Defendant:
Anyta McVeigh Cox and Douglas Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Cox v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Guy Cox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duncan v. Darke County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Adam Duncan
Defendant:
Darke County Sheriff's Office, Thomas Combs, Stephen Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pryor v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 4:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Nc LaFonse Pryor and Norman LaFonte Pryor
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lieutinent Arianna Brock, M. Darkangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Bank of America
as 1:2023cv01976
Plaintiff:
Jamaa J. Cox
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Cox v. Bank of America
as 1:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Sabrina L. Cox
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Cox v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
as 1:2023cv00532
Petitioner:
Gregory Cox
Respondent:
Warden, Southeastern Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox, Sr. et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02663
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cox, Sr. and Susan Cox
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
