Cottle v. Gedney et al
| Sean Cottle |
| Romeo Aranas and Karen Gedney |
| 3:2015cv00542 |
| November 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER - This action is dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court that he would like to proceed, in compliance with this Court's June 23, 2016, order (ECF No. 21 ). Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 7/20/2016 to remove extraneous text from doc title, and add directive to clerk (DRM).
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER directing AG's Office to (1) send a letter to Defendant Dr. Gedney re this lawsuit, (2) file an updated notice within 30 days re Dr. Gedney's representation status, and (3) advise the Court within 30 days re limited notice of appearan ce o/b/o Dr. Gedney for the purpose of settlement; extending the 90-day stay and status report deadline, if this case remains in the early inmate mediation program, until 5 days after any scheduled mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
