Harter v. McDaniel et al
| Harold E. Harter |
| Romeo Aranas, Connie S. Bisbee, K. Hegge, Lewis, E.K. McDaniel and Don Poag |
| 3:2016cv00118 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| William G. Cobb |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER that this action is dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint in compliance with this Court's July 18, 2016 screening order ECF No. 3 , August 30, 2016 order denying Plaintiff's motion to stay the scr eening order ECF No. 7 , September 1, 2016 order granting Plaintiff an extension to file an amended complaint, and for failure to state a claim. Denying as moot ECF No. 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER - The Court grants Plaintiff an extension to file an amended complaint. First Amended Complaint due by 9/15/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/1/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 5 Motion to Stay the Screening Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/30/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
