Quintero v. Aranan et al
| John Quintero |
| Romeo Aranan, Isidro Baca, Connie Bisbee, Carnes, Dwayne Deal, Venus Fajota, Darla Foley, Linda Fox, Ed Gray, Peter Keegan, Adam Laxalt, E.K. McDaniel, Larry Pihson, Joseph Prieto, Dawn Rosenberg, Brian Sandoval, Pauline Simmons, Scott Sisco, James Stogner, David Tristan and James Wright |
| 3:2016cv00673 |
| November 18, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER accepting and adopting in full ECF Nos. 114 and 116 Report and Recommendations; granting ECF No. 62 Defendants' motion to dismiss; granting ECF No. 77 Defendants' motion for summary judgment; granting nun pro tunc ECF Nos. 89 and 90 Defendants Laxalt and Prieto's motions to extend time; denying ECF Nos. 81 Plaintiff's motion to strike and 98 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplemental evidence; deny ing as moot ECF Nos. 47 Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, 48 Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, 58 Plaintiff's motion requesting submission, 64 Defendants' motion to stay discovery, 66 Plaintiff's motion to strike; 74 Plaintiff's motion seeking a protective order, 84 Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment, and 86 Plaintiff's motion to extend time; directing Clerk to strike Plaintiff's reply briefs (ECF Nos. 122 , 123 ); directing Clerk to enter judgment in accordance with this order, and in Defendants' favor, and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDERED that Ds' motion to seal (ECF No. 100 ) is GRANTED. The presentence report was filed and shall remain under seal (ECF No. 101 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 7/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting ECF No. 91 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 84 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Responses due by 6/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 5/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER granting ECF No. 69 Stipulation To Extend Time re ECF No. 56 Second Amended Complaint: Defendants' answer/response due by 4/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 3/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting ECF No. 59 Motion : Answer/response to ECF No. 56 Second Amended Complaint due by 3/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin Carry on 2/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLA BALDWIN CARRY adopting in part and rejecting in part ECF No. 42 Report and Recommendation, declining to dismiss Counts III and V and adopting recommendation to dismis s Counts VII and VIII; granting in part and denying in part ECF No. 21 Motion for Leave to Amend; directing Clerk to file Second Amended Complaint; permitting Counts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI to proceed, dismissing without prejudice Count VII, dismissing with prejudice Count VIII. See order for full details. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting ECF No. 29 Motion to Extend Time re 3 Amended Complaint. Response due 30 days after this Court's determination of which complaint is controlling. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 4/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying ECF No. 20 Motion for Reconsideration; Clerk directed to send Plaintiff a copy of his motion for emergency injunction ECF No. 10 (mailed to plaintiff on 03/02/2018). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER - The IFP application (ECF No. 1 ) is granted. However, even if this action is dismissed plaintiff must pay the full $350 filing fee. Further ordered NDOC shall pay clerk from inmate account. Clerk shall send copy this order to Finance and NDOC inmate services. (E-service to Finance; mail to NDOC on 2/20/2018) Clerk shall E-serve AG this order and P's first amended complaint (ECF No. 3 ) by adding AG to docket sheet. (E-service 2/20/2018. First amended complaint (ECF No. 3 ) via NEF regeneration) AG shall advise by 3/13/2018 re acceptance of service, and file under seal address(es) for Ds for which service not accepted. P shall file a motion re unserved Ds. If service accepted then answer due by 4/21/2018. Hencefo rth P shall serve Ds a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. This case is no longer stayed. The motion for emergency injunction (ECF No. 10 is denied. The motion for copies (ECF No. 15 ) is denied in part and granted in part. Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. (Docket sheet mailed to P 2/20/2018.) Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting ECF No. 8 Motion to Resend ECF No. 4 Screening Order; clerk directed to send P a copy of ECF No. 4 Screening Order (mailed to P at WSCC on 12/27/2017). Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
