Lepley v. Filson et al
Brian Eugene Lepley |
Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2017cv00693 |
November 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Howard D. McKibben |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER dismissing without prejudice the petition for lack of jurisdiction; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting ECF Nos. 6 Motion to Extend Time to respond to Order to Show Cause ECF No. 3 and motion for a copy of the petition 8 ; Clerk directed to provide USCA, Case No. 17-73296, with a copy of petition ECF No. 4 , show-cause ord er ECF No. 3 and this order (NEF regenerated on 01/02/2018); Clerk to send petitioner a copy of the petition ECF No. 4 (mailed to p on 01/02/2018). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting ECF No. 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis;clerk directed to file the petition ECF No. 1 - 1; petitioner to file show cause response by 12/29/2017. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.