Milewski v. Kohn et al
| Richard Milewski |
| Detective Freeman, Shana Bowers, Phillip J. Kohn, Stephen Wolfson, Clemmons, Robert Draskovich, Kirsten Dinicola, Christopher Hamner, Violet Brown and Douglas E. Smith |
| 3:2019cv00095 |
| February 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/12/2019. Plaintiff's motions (ECF Nos. #16 , #17 , #18 ) are DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 18 PROPOSED ORDER Setting Inmate Early Mediation Conference, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (DRM) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Compel Discovery, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/25/2019. (DRM) |
| Filing 16 MOTION Request for Informal Settlement Discussion, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/25/2019. (DRM) |
| Filing 15 MOTION Request for Injunction, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/25/2019. (DRM) |
| Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 4/4/2019, granting ECF No. #13 Motion to Extend Time, giving Plaintiff to 5/20/2019 to comply with ECF No. #7 Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
| Filing 13 MOTION to Extend Time re ECF No. #7 Order, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (LH) |
| Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/29/2019. Plaintiff's ECF Nos. #9 , #10 , #11 Motions are DENIED withoout prejudice as premature. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Order Setting Inmate Early Mediation Conference, filed by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/11/2019. (LH) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Order Compelling Disclosure or Discovery of All Points of Notice of Intent, filed by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/11/2019. (LH) |
| Filing 9 MOTION Request for Informal Settlement Discussion, filed by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. Responses due by 4/11/2019. (LH) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Correct Spelling of Defendants Name, by Richard Milewski. (DRM) |
Filing 7
ORDER - Motion to extend time (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. IFP application or $400 filing fee; and, amended complaint due by 4/19/2019. Clerk shall SEND P IFP form and instructions (Mailed to P 3/11/2019.) Clerk shall SEND P 1983 form. (Mailed to P 3/11/2019.) Plaintiff's motion to perpetuate testimony (ECF No. #5 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's request for an injunction (ECF No. #6 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION - Request for Injunction, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (KR) |
| Filing 5 MOTION - Request to Perpetuate Testimony, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (KR) |
| Filing 4 NOTIFICATION OF INTERROGATORIES, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (KR) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time, by Plaintiff Richard Milewski. (KR) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (LH) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE : No IFP Application, or Filing Fee was received with Initiating Documents, filed by Richard Milewski. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(LH) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. (WJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
