Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CLEMMONS v. MOTLEY et al
as 3:2026cv04946
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S CLEMMONS
Defendant:
MOTLEY, COFFIELD, HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Bowens et al
as 3:2026cv01467
Plaintiff:
Robbie Orr Simpson
Defendant:
Deonna Gist Bowens, Matt Burbank, Cameron Clemmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelly v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2026cv01301
Plaintiff:
Katrina Kelly
Defendant:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Jennifer Clemmons-Abdullah, Physician Correctional USA (MO), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gates v. Clemmons
as 2:2026cv00296
Petitioner:
Justin Paul Gates
Respondent:
Clemmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clemmons v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2026cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jesaiah Clemmons
Defendant:
Director Wayne T. Salisbury, Warden Lynn Corry, Deputy Warden Jack Vicino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemmons v. Salisbury, et al.
as 1:2026cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jesaiah Clemmons
Defendant:
Director Wayne T. Salisbury, Lynne Corry, Jack Vicino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CADEJUSTE v. CLEMMONS
as 4:2026cv00204
Plaintiff:
MARCO THONY CADEJUSTE
Defendant:
CLEMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
CLEMMONS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv00593
Plaintiff:
ALESIA CLEMMONS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gray, Kenneth v. Fox, Alexis et al
as 3:2026cv00049
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M. Gray
Defendant:
Alexis Fox, Marilynn Hale, Rachel Sadowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
