Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
Karla Walker Jones, Clevon Randolph, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Helms et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Solomon LaDaniel Henderson
Defendant:
Tony Helms, Mike McCorment, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Lt. Radalphe, Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons, Sgt. Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Patrick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons, Nurse Practitioner Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodyard v. Peck et al
as 5:2019cv01850
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Robinson, Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
Draper Woodyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Pavirov et al
as 5:2019cv00888
Defendant:
Juan Bailey, Florence, Corizon Health Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Robbins et al
as 5:2016cv01483
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Jerry Edward Robbins, Jr, Ivan Provision, Sussmune Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemmons v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Sean Christopher Clemmons
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
