D'Agostino v. Naughton et al
| Frank D'Agostino |
| M. Sullivan, Naughton, Crawford and Alley |
| 3:2020cv00480 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| William G Cobb |
| Robert C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE that this case is randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb for all further proceedings consistent to his jurisdiction. All further documents must bear the correct case number 3:20-cv-00480-RCJ-WGC. (no image attached) (LE) |
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 9/18/2020. With good cause appearing, the Honorable Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin recuses herself in this action. IT IS ORDERED that this action is referred to the Clerk for random reassignment of this case for all further proceedings. (no image attached) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LE) |
| Filing 8 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 400.00, receipt number NVRNO-5057 (no image attached) (AB) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Telephonic Conference on September 4th, 2020 (in reference to Case 3:20-cv-00480's possible violation of settlement agreement made in case 3:18cv0337MMDCLB) (LW) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of payment of filing fee per Court Order ECF No. #3 with attached financial certificate, by Frank D'Agostino. (LW) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Complaint filed pro per by Frank D'Agostino. (LW) |
| Filing 4 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Telephonic Status Conference held on 9/4/2020 before Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. Crtrm Administrator: LGM; Pla Counsel: Ryan Hamilton; Def Counsel: Doug Rands; Recording start and end times: 10:02:01 - 10:09:32; Courtroom: 1; The Court addresses the parties regarding the purpose of this hearing. The Court believes that the plaintiff does not understand that the issues raised in the new lawsuit have been resolved and that he may be violating the terms of the settlement agreement in this case. Mr. Hamilton advises that he will contact the plaintiff to discuss the Court's concerns. See the attached order for specifications. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LGM) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Clerk will send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by an inmate including the information and instructions (Attached hereto distribution to Plaintiff by NNCC). On or before October 26, 2020, Plaintiff will either pay the full $400 filing fee for a civil action or file with the Court a completed IFP application with a financial certificate and a copy of inmate's prison/jail trust fund account statement for the previous six-month period. If Plaintiff does not timely comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. Clerk will retain the Complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but will not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 8/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (AB) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (AB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
