Cases 1 - 10 of 612
Alley et al v. State Farm Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv05347
Plaintiff:
Price Alley, Sarah Broaten and Essie Alley
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Joshua Alley
as 24-1788
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Joshua L. Alley
Alley et al v. Franklyn et al
as 2:2024cv00824
Plaintiff:
Michael Alley and Halsted Strategy Group
Defendant:
David Franklyn, Unknown Franklyn and David Franklyn IP Consulting LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alley v. World Wide Carriers, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Garith Levi Alley
Defendant:
World Wide Carriers, Inc. and Balvir Dhurke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
ALLEY CAT ALLIES INCORPORATED
Defendant:
UNITED STATES NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, CHARLES F. SAMS, III, MARK FOUST and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
ALLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
CHADLEY DEAN ALLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
