Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vieux v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
Richard Vieux
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Ray Holt and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv01317
Plaintiff:
Gary C Walker
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John T Rathman, B Alley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Reese et al
as 7:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Scott Robinson
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Becky Clay, V Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina-Guerrero v. Rathman et al
as 1:2010cv03330
Plaintiff:
Jorge A Medina-Guerrero
Defendant:
John T. Rathman, B Alley, Holbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Holbrook et al
as 1:2010cv03287
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
William Holbrook, Mounir Mourtada, B Alley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alley Drug Stores Partnership et al v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2010cv02564
Plaintiff:
Alley Drug Stores Partnership and Holmes Oil Company Inc
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of and Baptist Health System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saucedo-Gonzalez v. Holbrook et al
as 1:2010cv02375
Plaintiff:
Luis Saucedo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
William Holbrook, B Alley, John Rathman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colwell v. Woodruff et al
as 5:2010cv01554
Plaintiff:
Preston Colwell
Defendant:
James W Woodruff, Donald B Mansell and Edward L Alley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman-Garcia v. Reese et al
as 1:2010cv01066
Plaintiff:
Edwin Guzman-Garcia
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Becky Clay, Greg Smith and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
