Herndon v. Neven et al
Thomas Wray Herndon |
Dwight Neven and Nevada Attorney General |
3:2020cv00489 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 RECEIPT of Payment: $ 5.00, receipt number NVRNO005083 (no image attached) (AB) |
Filing 8 NOTICE to Clerk by Thomas Wray Herndon : Brass slip submitted for payment of $5 filing fee. (DRM) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re ECF No. #4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Thomas Wray Herndon. (Service of corrected image is attached.) (Image re ECF No. #4 has been replaced. NEF regenerated.) (DRM) |
|
Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Petitioner Thomas Wray Herndon. (DRM) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Petitioner Thomas Wray Herndon. (DRM) (Main Document 4 replaced on 9/10/2020) (DRM). |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE from USDC advising case against Dwight Neven, et al., has been received and assigned case number 3:20-cv-00489. (DRM) |
Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Petitioner. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Petition for WHC, #2 Cover letter, Envelope) (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.