Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
| Mitchell Keith Goodrum |
| Lane Mills, Churchill County District Attorney's Office, Charles Woodman, Nevada, State of and Jeffery Weed |
| 3:2020cv00541 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Carla Baldwin |
| Robert C Jones |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Goodrum's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) be GRANTED; that Goodrum's two motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. #1 -2, #4 ) be DENIED as moot; and that Goodrum's complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Objections to R&R due by 11/2/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 10/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (LW) |
| Filing 3 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (LW) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (KR) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (WJ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE: No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received, by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Counsel) (KR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
