Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Arthur E. Mallory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Arthur Mallory Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron D. Ford, Churchill County Clerks Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ANTHONY v. STOP & SHOP et al
as 3:2021cv20228
Plaintiff:
DARLENE ANTHONY
Defendant:
STOP & SHOP, LANES MILL ASSOC %, GOLDENBERG GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Lane Mills, Churchill County District Attorney's Office, Charles Woodman and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrum v. Churchill County et al
as 3:2020cv00538
Defendant:
Lane Mills, Sue Savon, Churchill, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mills v. Pearson
as 4:2017cv00296
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lane Mills
Defendant:
Steven Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcelli v. Edwards et al
as 3:2014cv00559
Defendant:
Jerry Edwards, Robert Estes, Lane Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Marcelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Marcelli, et al v. USDC-NVR
as 14-71326
:
In re: ANTHONY MICHAEL MARCELLI and WILLIAM SHROPSHIRE
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MICHAEL MARCELLI and WILLIAM SHROPSHIRE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest:
THE STATE OF NEVADA, BRIAN SANDOVAL, ROSS MILLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
