Brooks v. Roman et al
| Shane Brooks |
| Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney, Joshua Weiland, Sarah O'Donnell, Guzman, Serle, Warden William Gittere, William Reubart, David Drummond, Tasheena Cooke and Cooke |
| 3:2022cv00474 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Shane Brooks. (HKL) |
Filing 3
ORDER - Fully complete IFP Application or payment of $402 filing fee due 12/27/2022. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff Shane Brooks the approved IFP application for an inmate and instructions for the same(Form and inst attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library) and retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 10/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (CJS) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (CJS) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (CJS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
