Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19894
Plaintiff:
DAVID SHANE BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. Exxum et al
as 3:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Doctor Exxum, Doctor Michael Hanf, Nurse Melissa Kington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Time Keepers et al
as 3:2020cv00494
Defendant:
Deputy Prison Directors, Time Keepers, Offender Management Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shane Brooks v. Lisa Walsh, et al
as 17-15571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANE BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA WALSH, Assistant Warden of Programs and Grievance Co-ordinator, MCBROOM, f.n.u., Grievance Co-ordinator Aide and MELANIE MCBROOM
Brooks v. Suarez et al
as 3:2016cv00380
Defendant:
Jason Artinger, D. Esquvel, R. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brooks v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv00449
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Harold Byrnes, Michael Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Triple J J J Travel Plaza Inc et al
as 5:2015cv01235
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Triple J J J Travel Plaza Inc , Bill Jones , Donna R Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Brooks v. Walsh et al
as 2:2014cv00497
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
f.n.u. McBroom and Lisa Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Aranas et al
as 3:2013cv00196
Defendant:
Dr. Romeo Aranas, Robert Bannister, Cheryl Dressler and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
