Banasiak v. Cook et al
Joshua N. Banasiak |
Taneesha Cook, Michael Minev, Hanf, Martin and Hicks |
3:2022cv00527 |
November 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Carla Baldwin |
Miranda M Du |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 COMPLAINT by Joshua N. Banasiak. (Filed with leave to amend pursuant to ECF No. #3 Order.) (DRM) |
Filing 3 SCREENING ORDER - A decision on ECF No. #1 IFP application is deferred. Clerk is directed to file the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1), and send P a courtesy copy. (Attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Claims are dismissed, or as detailed herein. Any "First Amended " complaint due within 30 days of entry of this order (2/24/2023). Clerk directed to send P 1983 complaint form, instruction, and copy of his Complaint. (Form, instr, attached hereto for distribution to P via ESP law library.) Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint for Plaintiff, #2 1983 Form and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joshua N. Banasiak. (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(DRM) |
Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.