Parkes v. State of Nevada et al
| Robert E. Parkes |
| State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Douglas Rand, Isidro Baca and Taresa Wickham |
| 3:2023cv00015 |
| January 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Craig S Denney |
| Robert C Jones |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER.IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff has until 3/13/2023 to either pay the full $402 filing fee or file a complete IFP Application with the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff Robert E. Parkes the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same and retain the complaint (ECF No. 1-1) but not file it at this time. See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 1/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application and Instructions)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KF)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert C. Jones and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
