Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Hintze v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-6806
Defendant:
KIRK WIDMAR, Associate Warden of Operations, LCC, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, Secretary of State/Board of Prison Commissioner, Dr. IHAN AZZAM, Medical Officer, Dept. of Health and Human Services, Division of Public and Behavioral Health and others
Plaintiff:
JASON HINTZE
Guy v. Henley, et al.
as 24-6746
Respondent:
JOHN HENLEY and AARON FORD, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CURTIS GUY
Cushman v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2024cv01983
Defendant:
Lisa Lucas, Frank Dreesen, Calvin Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
James W. Cushman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mollett v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01973
Petitioner:
Tyran Mollett
Respondent:
Aaron Ford, Williams and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00455
Respondent:
Nathanah Breitenbach, Aaron Ford, State of Nevada and others
Petitioner:
Gene Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Pope et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Defendant:
Brad Pope, Bre True, Nicole Van Jaeger and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Patrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodrum v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-4827
Defendant:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARLA BALDWIN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL KEITH GOODRUM
Hayes v. City of Las Vegas, et al.
as 24-4810
Defendant:
VARSIN, Order ECF. 95, MCELROY, Order ECF. 95, MIRAGE HOTEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. HAYES
Gato v. Breitenbach, et al.
as 24-4739
Respondent:
STATE OF NEVADA, N. BREITENBACH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and others
Petitioner:
RENE GATO
Harris v. Ford
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Rene G. Harris
Defendant:
Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
