Dow v. Brannon et al
| Richard Dow |
| Ira Brannon, G. Ingham, Branole, Hodge and Frazier |
| 3:2023cv00621 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Anne R Traum |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Richard Dow. (GA) |
Filing 3
ORDER - IFP Application (ECF No. #1 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has until February 9, 2024, to either pay the full $405 filing fee or file a new fully complete IFP application. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff Richard Dow the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis for an inmate and instructions for the same and retain the complaint (ECF No. #1 -1) but not file it at this time. (Mailed 12/12/2023). Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 12/11/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DLS) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Richard Dow. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Motion for Appointment of Counsel)(DLS) |
| Case randomly assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
