Cases 1 - 10 of 5,867
Frazier v. Dynamic Insurance Services et al
as 1:2025cv00843
Plaintiff:
Erien Frazier
Defendant:
Dynamic Insurance Services and John/Jane Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Frazier v. Iowa
as 1:2025cv00026
Petitioner:
Billy DeWayne Frazier, IV
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2025cv00433
Plaintiff:
Erien Frazier
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Game Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Frazier v. Advanced Beauty, Inc.
as 1:2025cv02470
Plaintiff:
Tanya Frazier
Defendant:
Advanced Beauty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frazier v. Iowa
as 1:2025cv00024
Plaintiff:
Billy DeWayne Frazier, IV
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Carter v. Metro Nashville Police Department et al
as 3:2025cv00271
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Winn Carter
Defendant:
Metro Nashville Police Department, City of Nashville, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hill v. Scott et al
as 5:2025cv05049
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Hill
Defendant:
Deputy Chief T. Scott, Mike Hagar, Tyler Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorman v. Moody et al
as 3:2025cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
T Moody, J English, Aramark Sup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
