Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Frizzell et al v. Warden of the Telford Unit et al
as 5:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Jason Frizzell, Auqeis Harper, Darrian Johnson and others
Defendant:
Warden of the Telford Unit, Ranking Officers of the Telford Unit, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Social Security
as 1:2026cv01191
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Frazier
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05639
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Frazier v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv11010
Plaintiff:
John Frazier
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Frazier v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv10115
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Frazier
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Philip Frazier v. Bettie Dubose, et al
as 26-3256
Plaintiff:
PHILIP FRAZIER
Defendant:
BETTIE DUBOSE, EMPLOYEE OF SCI PHOENIX, PHYLLIS DUBOSE, EMPLOYEE OF SCI-PHOENIX, CAMISHA DUBOSE, EMPLOYEE OF SCI-PHOENIX and others
Frazier v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv09767
Plaintiff:
Joseph Frazier
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Wallace et al v. Frazier Industrial Company
as 2:2026cv00368
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Wallace and Susan Elizabeth Wallace
Defendant:
Frazier Industrial Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
