Cases 1 - 10 of 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
United States of America v. $7,049 in U.S. Currency
as 0:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,049 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Keonee Nasier Shafer-Frazier
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Frazier v. Coloplast Corp. et al
as 0:2022cv03217
Plaintiff:
Cathy Frazier
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp., Coloplast Manufacturing US, LLC and Coloplast Manufacturing US, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Frazier v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv03129
Plaintiff:
Kirk Loren Frazier
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Frazier v. Mueller
as 0:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Eddie Markeith Frazier
Defendant:
Scott David Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00885
Plaintiff:
Shantell Frazier
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Frazier v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Roy Frazier
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Prouty v. All current and past Health Services Employee's Employed at DHS-MSOP et al
as 0:2021cv02457
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Prouty
Defendant:
All current and past Health Services Employee's Employed at DHS-MSOP, Melissa Class, Sharon K. Autio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barham et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Darrell Walls, Jesus Gallego, Kevin Starin and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
