Goodrum v. 10th Judicial District Court et al
| Mitchell Keith Goodrun and Mitchell Keith Goodrum |
| 10th Judicial District Court, Robert E. Estes, State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, New River Township and Mayor |
| 3:2024cv00011 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Craig S Denney |
| Miranda M Du |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Plaintiff Mitchell Keith Goodrum. (GA) |
Filing 3
ORDER - The Clerk shall SEND Plaintiff a copy of the instructions and application to proceed IFP for an inmate. (ATTACHED HERETO FOR DISTRIBUTION TO P VIA NNCC LAW LIBRARY). Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Order (2/3/2024) to either file his completed IFP application or pay the full $405 filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 1/4/2024. (Attachments: #1 IFP form/Instruction)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
|
| Filing 2 ADVISORY LETTER to litigant. (DRM) |
| Filing 1 RECEIPT of Initiating Documents by Court on behalf of Plaintiff. No Application to Proceed IFP or Filing Fee received. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Leave to File) (DRM) |
| Case randomly assigned to Chief Judge Miranda M. Du and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney. (DRM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
