DesRoches v. US Postal Service, Postmaster General
| 1:2005cv00088 |
| March 17, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of New Hampshire |
| Concord Office |
| Paul J. Barbadoro |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (ADA 1990) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER TO RELEASE FUNDS AND TO QUASH WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT as to 105 Writ of Continuing Garnishment. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (vln)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER TO RELEASE FUNDS AND TO QUASH WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT as to Bellwether Community Credit Union. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (vln)
|
|
Filing
98
///ORDER granting 95 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (vln)
|
|
Filing
94
///ORDER granting 72 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jna) Modified on 5/12/2009 to add: ///(vln).
|
|
Filing
62
///ORDER granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. So Ordered by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (jar)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 9 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. So Ordered by Judge Paul Barbadoro. (ja, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Hampshire District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DesRoches v. US Postal Service, Postmaster General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
